{"id":27275,"date":"2023-10-17T18:24:43","date_gmt":"2023-10-17T18:24:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/?p=27275"},"modified":"2023-10-17T19:10:07","modified_gmt":"2023-10-17T19:10:07","slug":"the-uk-establishment-is-using-war-to-attack-protest-at-home","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/2023\/10\/17\/the-uk-establishment-is-using-war-to-attack-protest-at-home\/","title":{"rendered":"The UK establishment is using war to attack protest at home"},"content":{"rendered":"

The following article written by Benny Hunter was first posted by openDemocracy<\/a>. It argues that the war in the Middle East has led British political actors to try and redefine what is ‘acceptable speech’<\/strong><\/p>\n

THE UK ESTABLISHMENT IS USING THE WAR TO ATTACK PROTEST AT HOME<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Protest in London against Israeli assault on Gaza<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

As a humanitarian crisis unfolds in the Middle East, the UK government and its backers in the media have sought to marginalise and silence dissenting voices by targeting protest movements showing solidarity with the Palestinian cause.<\/p>\n

Hundreds of people in Israel were killed, just over a week ago, in a brutal attack by Hamas. In response, Israel has moved swiftly against Hamas and the Palestinian population living in the Gaza strip. It has cut off their electricity and prevented the entry of food, water and medical supplies as it commences a devastating bombardment of homes and civilian infrastructure, leaving hundreds dead.<\/p>\n

The reaction to these unfolding events in Britain has been one of shock and anger. Amongst the political class, a closing of the ranks has occurred, shoring up support for Israel as it strikes against the Palestinian population. And as part of this, political actors have sought to demarcate new boundaries on what is acceptable speech in the UK.<\/p>\n

Foreign secretary James Cleverly on Tuesday\u00a0urged<\/a>\u00a0pro-Palestinian protesters to stay at home. And home secretary Suella Braverman\u00a0wrote to police chiefs<\/a>\u00a0asking them to take action against acts of protest that \u2013 in whose eyes it was not clear \u2013 might indicate support for Hamas.<\/p>\n

She singled out the waving of the Palestinian flag in particular as being illegitimate \u201cwhen intended to glorify acts of terrorism\u201d, and asked that the police \u201cconsider whether chants such as: \u2018From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free\u2019 should be understood as an expression of violent desire to see Israel erased from the world\u201d and therefore a \u201cracially aggravated\u201d crime.<\/p>\n

The Telegraph has also\u00a0reported<\/a>\u00a0that Robert Jenrick, the immigration minister, has commissioned officials in the Home Office to consider how they could revoke visas and expel foreign students who \u201cpraise Hamas\u201d.<\/p>\n

There are undoubtedly circumstances in which the use of particular chants or imagery could be inflammatory or even threatening. But the purpose of these statements is not to protect British communities (that much is clear from Braverman\u2019s failure to issue a similar letter warning against attacks on Muslim or pro-Palestinian groups). The purpose is rather to intimidate would-be protestors and delegitimise criticism of Israel by aligning it with criminality.<\/p>\n

The government\u2019s views on acts of protest are mirrored by the official opposition:\u00a0a diktat<\/a>\u00a0sent out by Labour Party general secretary David Evans warned members, councillors and MPs against attending pro-Palestine demonstrations. Labour has gone further still by also forbidding debate on Israel-Palestine in local party branches \u2013 a censorship not even attempted by Tony Blair during the lead-up to the Iraq war.<\/p>\n

The results of Braverman’s provocation can already be seen. On Wednesday, Greater Manchester Police arrested four people for breaching the peace \u201cduring events\u2026 marking the Hamas-Israel conflict\u201d, later de-arresting three of them.\u00a0A video<\/a>\u00a0taken at the scene of the arrest and posted online shows a young man being led into a police van, a Palestine flag wrapped around his shoulders, as concerned onlookers shout at officers: \u201cHe has done nothing wrong,\u201d and: \u201cFreedom of speech.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Metropolitan Police Service itself appears to have\u00a0ruled out<\/a>\u00a0any crackdown on people waving the Palestinian flag. But on Thursday night, the Palestinian Literature Festival was\u00a0forced to cancel<\/a>\u00a0a book launch for Jewish American journalist Nathan Thrall\u2019s latest book \u2018A Day in the Life of Abed Salama: A Palestine Story,\u2019 \u201cafter the Metropolitan Police Service contacted the host organisation and asked that it be cancelled \u2018due to security concerns\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n

And at London\u2019s \u2018March for Palestine\u2019 demonstration on Saturday, legal observers from Black Protest Legal Support\u00a0witnessed the police make arrests<\/a>\u00a0of protesters who had refused to remove the \u2018keffiyeh\u2019 \u2013 a chequered black and white scarf that is symbolic of Palestinian nationalism and is traditionally worn around the head. In a statement, the Met Police confirmed\u00a0four arrests<\/a>\u00a0for failing to remove face coverings that concealed the arrestee\u2019s identity \u2013 at least one person has been subsequently charged, whilst others have been referred to youth offending teams.<\/p>\n

These events (and the statements that preceded them) should be of concern not just to advocates of the Palestinian cause, but to anyone concerned about the erosion of democratic norms: here is the government using the murder of Israeli civilians abroad to attack free speech and the right to protest here in the UK.<\/p>\n

One lawyer who spoke to openDemocracy this week linked Braverman\u2019s crackdown on Palestinian flag-waving to the Public Order Act. That piece of legislation (which received royal assent in May 2023) was intended to break the backs of the climate movement, making it far easier for police forces to deem acts of protest illegal and criminalise those in attendance or organisers, for even minor disruption.<\/p>\n

And last year, the Met Police used the spectre of Covid to target and criminalise those protesting against police brutality at a vigil for Sarah Everard, who was murdered by police officer Wayne Couzens.<\/p>\n

Each crisis \u2013 climate, Covid, war \u2013 is seized upon by the state, government and media, as an opportunity to stifle dissent and curtail free speech. And it is through this framing that we can understand the response of the political and media establishment in the UK to Israel-Palestine: not simply as solidarity with the Israeli people but as an opportunity to attack our rights.<\/p>\n

Attacks on freedom of speech relating to Palestine are not new. Palestinians in Britain have long experienced marginalisation and silencing, especially when giving voice to views on the\u00a0\u201cPalestinian experience of colonialism\u201d<\/a>.<\/p>\n

This has been seen in particular within academia, which has become a battleground over acceptable speech on Israel-Palestine. In British schools,\u00a0pupils have been sanctioned<\/a>\u00a0for expressing vocal support for Palestine, including with detentions and suspensions. Fear about reprisals, including referrals to the government anti-extremism programme Prevent, has been described as having a \u2018chilling effect\u2019 on engagement of students with the topic of Palestine.<\/p>\n

This is part of a broader effort by the UK Home Office to identify protest movements and left-wing struggles as being outside of acceptable debate, with recent changes to\u00a0the training on Prevent<\/a>\u00a0categorising \u201csocialism\u201d and \u201canti-fascism\u201d under the heading \u201cterrorist ideologies\u201d. This process of delegitimisation is often backed by the media. In recent days attacks on free speech on Palestine have intensified.<\/p>\n

On Wednesday, a report in\u00a0the Times<\/a>\u00a0was published that \u201cidentified a dozen academics at Oxbridge and Russell Group universities who have posted statements appearing to justify the weekend\u2019s attacks on Israel\u201d. In one case, an academic had simply called for solidarity with the Palestinian struggle.<\/p>\n

Much of the right-wing press has also chosen this moment to campaign for the BBC to refer to Hamas as a terrorist organisation, a term the BBC says does not meet impartiality rules \u2013 with\u00a0the front page headline<\/a>\u00a0of Thursday\u2019s Daily Mail eschewing proclamations on the outbreak of war and instead asking: \u201cThe King Calls Them Terrorists, Why Can\u2019t The BBC?\u201d. Defence secretary Grant Shapps also criticised the BBC on Radio 4\u00a0over the decision<\/a>\u00a0in a combative interview. The prominence this demand has been given raises questions about the priorities of the British press at such a high stakes moment.<\/p>\n

Gaza is already partially reduced to rubble by Israeli airstrikes. More than two million people are experiencing total siege, bombardment and the removal of all basic human rights. Chemical weapons have now been confirmed as being in play and preparations are underway for a ground offensive by Israeli troops, with the 1.1 million Palestinians living in the most populated area of Gaza given 24 hours to move further south. This will almost certainly mean further atrocities.<\/p>\n

The government and opposition both stand steadfastly behind Israel. Number 10 has said the UK will send surveillance aircraft and two Royal Navy ships to the eastern Mediterranean in plans \u201cto support Israel\u201d. The foreign secretary, James Cleverly, has himself travelled to Israel to \u201cunderline UK\u2019s unwavering solidarity in the face of terror\u201d. And both the leader of the opposition, Keir Starmer, and his shadow attorney general, Emily Thornberry, have refused to criticise Israel\u2019s actions in Gaza or describe the \u201ccollective punishment\u201d of civilians as a war crime.<\/p>\n

This shocking complicity must be loudly challenged. Yet, as with the arrival of any shocking event, the political class moves quickly to turn the dial down ever further on legitimate speech.<\/p>\n

If a ceasefire does arrive, without dissenting voices, the missing context \u2013 the dislocation of Palestinians in 1948, the occupation of the West Bank since 1967 and the 16-year blockade of Gaza \u2013 will continue not to be heard. As long as this silencing act continues, both the Palestinian and Israeli people will continue to suffer.<\/p>\n

15.10.23<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

__________<\/p>\n

also see:<\/p>\n

EL&SD coverage of Palestine, Zionism and Israel since 2002<\/a><\/p>\n

Police turned up to a coal mine operating without a licence; to arrest protesters – Glen Black, The Canary<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

Rishi Sunak defends Suella Braverman\u2019s appearance at radical \u2018National Conservatism\u2019 event alongside \u2018Great Replacement\u2019 conspiracy theorists – Adam Bienkov & Karam Bales, <\/strong>Byline supplement<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The following article written by Benny Hunter was first posted by openDemocracy. It argues that the war in the Middle East has led British political actors to try and redefine what is ‘acceptable speech’ THE UK ESTABLISHMENT IS USING THE WAR TO ATTACK PROTEST AT HOME As a humanitarian crisis unfolds in the Middle East,…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1855,1858,1861,1867,1846,1868,1862,1870],"tags":[9244],"class_list":["post-27275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-exploitation-and-emancipation","category-oppression-liberation","category-alienation-self-determination","category-emancipation-liberation-and-self-determination","category-british-imperialism","category-against-imperialism","category-ideology-and-religion","category-middle-east-and-north-africa","tag-author-benny-hunter"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"https:\/\/mastodon.scot\/@rcfscotland\/111251756703980691","error":""},"views":1245,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=27275"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27288,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27275\/revisions\/27288"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=27275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=27275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=27275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}