{"id":16342,"date":"2007-11-18T18:41:04","date_gmt":"2007-11-18T18:41:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/?p=16342"},"modified":"2022-01-28T10:47:02","modified_gmt":"2022-01-28T10:47:02","slug":"making-the-north-east-atlantic-safe-for-global-capitalism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/2007\/11\/18\/making-the-north-east-atlantic-safe-for-global-capitalism\/","title":{"rendered":"Making The North East Atlantic Safe For Global Capitalism &#8211; a talk given by Allan Armstrong at the G8 Alternatives Summit"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>A talk given by Allan Armstrong (Republican Communist Network Platform in the Scottish Socialist Party) at the <acronym title=\"Group of Eight\">G8<\/acronym> Alternatives Summit on July 3rd 2005 in Edinburgh<\/h2>\n<p>Earlier today, Eamon McCann, leading <acronym title=\"Socialist Workers Party\">SWP<\/acronym> member in Ireland, introduced a session entitled, Making Northern Ireland Safe for Neo-liberalism. It is revealing that such a prominent <acronym title=\"Socialist Workers Party\">SWP<\/acronym> member should concentrate on economic policy and focus on just part of the partitioned Irish nation. I want to look at the wider political picture, locating Ireland as a whole, along with Scotland, England and Wales, in the current imperial plans for this part of the world. Therefore, the title of my talk is Making the North East Atlantic Safe for Global Capitalism.<\/p>\n<p>One consequence of this approach is that it highlights the role of <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> and <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> imperialism in the world. In contrast, the <acronym title=\"Socialist Workers Party\">SWP<\/acronym>&#8216;s general approach emphasises the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> link with global corporations and its imperial policies, particularly in Iraq. It downplays British imperialism. This is highlighted by their electoral intervention in Northern Ireland, where Eamon McCann, who stood as candidate for the <acronym title=\"Socialist and Environmental Alliance\">SEA<\/acronym> in the General Election, called for <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> and British troops to be withdrawn from Iraq. However, the <acronym title=\"Socialist and Environmental Alliance\">SEA<\/acronym> platform failed to even mention the larger number of British troops occupying Ireland &#8211; a remarkable oversight! The old Militant, now the Socialist Parties in England and Wales, in Ireland and their platform in the <acronym title=\"Scottish Socialist Party\">SSP<\/acronym>, have a similar blind-spot.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the neo-liberal economic policies being pursued throughout these islands are important. Their aim is to create the economic environment necessary for the global corporations to maximise their profits, particularly through the policies of deregulation and privatisation &#8211; something I&#8217;m sure will have been dealt with well at a number of sessions today. However, a wider political environment is needed for these economic policies to be pursued successfully. I will argue that this is the aim of the current British imperial <q>New Unionist<\/q> offensive, particularly its policy of trying to establish <q>devolution-all-round<\/q>. This is being done with the full cooperation of the Irish government.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the shared British and Irish governments&#8217; policy of <q>social partnership<\/q> with the trade union bureaucracies isn&#8217;t confined to advancing the neo-liberal economic agenda. These partnerships are mobilised to win wider support for the <q>Peace Process<\/q>, the Good Friday Agreement and the devolution settlements, all key to the <q>New Unionist<\/q> political strategy.<\/p>\n<p>It is perhaps helpful, before outlining the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym>\/<acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> government and global corporations&#8217; plans for the North East Atlantic region, to briefly outline some better known imperial projects in the world. A good place to start is South America, because this is the current epicentre of resistance to imperialism.<\/p>\n<p>The <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> state has developed a range of strategies to deal with this opposition. These started under President Clinton. Perhaps the best known is <q>Plan Colombia<\/q>. In Colombia imperialism faces opposition from the peasant-based guerilla movements of <acronym title=\"Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia - People's Army\">FARC EP<\/acronym> and the <acronym title=\"National Liberation Army\">ELN<\/acronym>, and also from independent trade unions fighting Shell-Amoco and Coca Cola. The <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> state, with the support of the British government, is giving full-backing, with both financial and military training, to the right-wing Uribe government, the Colombian army and the local death squads. As a consequence Colombia is one of the most oppressive states in the world.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of Venezuela, the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> state is continually trying to destabilise the elected radical Chavez government, through attempted coups, economic sanctions and a media offensive. Fortunately, so far, they haven\u00b9t been successful. However, they have overthrown the elected government of Haiti, by backing the ex-Batista supporters.<\/p>\n<p>However, there is another country, where a different approach has been tried, which is closer to the model being pursued here. That is Brazil. The Brazilian people, particularly workers and peasants, elected Workers Party leader, Lula, as President with great expectations. However, he has pushed the World Bank and <acronym title=\"International Monetary Fund\">IMF<\/acronym>&#8216;s economic policies, with the support of most trade union leaders there. His commitment to <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperialism&#8217;s neo-liberal agenda has even won him <acronym title=\"International Monetary Fund\">IMF<\/acronym> approval. Lula&#8217;s commitment to the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperial project has been further demonstrated by Brazil sending its armed forces to Haiti at the request of <acronym title=\"United Nations\">UN<\/acronym> &#8211; read <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperialism. This is closer to the plan being pursued here.<\/p>\n<p><acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperialism has other regional plans, most notoriously, the Republican Neo-Conservatives&#8217; <q>Plan for the New American Century<\/q>. It is being currently tested out in the Middle East, particularly Iraq. Control of oil is obviously a major aim.<\/p>\n<p>So what is the imperial and global corporate plan for our part of the world &#8211; the North East Atlantic? First, the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> is itself one of the members of <acronym title=\"Group of Eight\">G8<\/acronym>. This reflects the fact that it is home to several major global corporations itself. Nevertheless, the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> is much less powerful than the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym>, and New Labour know that the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> can not act as an independent imperial force in the world. This is why they seek to have <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> imperialism working as junior partner to <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperialism.<\/p>\n<p>In return for this support, British imperialism, has effectively been given the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperial and global corporate license or franchise for the North East Atlantic region. This license is political and military, as well as economic. The <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym>\u00b9s key role in <acronym title=\"North Atlantic Treaty Organisation\">NATO<\/acronym>, with former Labour War Minister, George Robertson, being trusted as President, highlights this.<\/p>\n<p>Ireland, however, is not a major economic player in the world. It has no independent global corporations. It is not represented on <acronym title=\"Group of 8\">G8<\/acronym>. Therefore, the Irish state is forced to act as infant partner to the junior partner &#8211; British imperialism. There is much pressure on the Irish state from both the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> and <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> to force it to abandon its policy of neutrality. <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym>\/<acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> success in this has been highlighted by the use made of Shannon Airport in the war against Iraq. Shannon now plays a similar role to Leuchars and Kinloss <acronym title=\"Royal Air Force\">RAF<\/acronym> stations in Scotland. Scotland, of course, also has the Faslane <acronym title=\"Royal Navy\">RN<\/acronym> nuclear submarine base.<\/p>\n<p>However, in order to pursue <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> and <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> governments&#8217; political and neo-liberal economic policies successfully, it has been necessary to establish a <q>New Unionist<\/q> political strategy for these islands. This is needed to create political stability. Since the defeat of the Miners&#8217; Strike in 1985 and Labour&#8217;s full commitment to New Realism, there has been little for the capitalist class to worry about, either from trade union or Labour leaders. New Labour now has the full confidence of the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> state and the British employers. The employers here are even prepared to accept the trade union bureaucracy committed to <q>social partnership<\/q>, as a very junior partner. <q>Social partnership<\/q> was pioneered by Fianna Fail in Ireland in 1987, at a time when the Tories were running the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> and were very hostile towards trade unions. Now <q>social partnership<\/q> is a shared policy of British and Irish governments.<\/p>\n<p>The real opposition the <q>New Unionist<\/q> project is designed to deal with has been the national democratic movements in Ireland, in particular, but also in Scotland and Wales. The strongest resistance, of course, came from the Republican Movement in Ireland. Now Des (Dalton &#8211; previous speaker from Republican Sinn Fein) has already outlined very well the history of Ireland&#8217;s Republican resistance and the role of British and <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> imperialism in trying to suppress or contain it. What I want to emphasise is how long it took for the British state to find a strategy to marginalise this and how the resulting strategy covers both islands.<\/p>\n<p>Labour&#8217;s Northern Ireland Minister, Roy Mason&#8217;s original <q>Criminalisation<\/q> policy was effectively defeated by the election of Bobby Sands during the Hunger Strike. Then Thatcher was forced into a very reluctant U-turn, abandoning her total support for the Ulster Unionists. She looked instead for assistance from the Irish government and the <acronym title=\"Social Democratic and Labour Party\">SDLP<\/acronym> through the Anglo-Irish Agreement. However, this too failed to defeat the Republicans so the Tories, under Major, put the first building block of a <q>New Unionist<\/q> political settlement into place &#8211; the Downing Street Declaration. This was designed to bring the Republican Movement on board and pave the road for a reformed Stormont.<\/p>\n<p>However, Ireland wasn&#8217;t the only place where there was opposition to the unionist status-quo. The attempted imposition of the hated poll-tax in Scotland in 1987, relit the dormant Scottish democratic movement too. The widespread opposition and mobilisations resembled the early days of the Civil Right Movement in the North. Jim Sillars was elected <acronym title=\"Member of Parliament\">MP<\/acronym> in Govan and Militant had six Councillors elected in Glasgow. National and republican sentiment grew in Scotland. The liberal wing of the Scottish establishment reached again for the old devolution solution, but unfortunately for them, the Tories held them in little fear. Nevertheless, the continued cull of elected Tories at all levels in Scotland, and the possible rise of the <acronym title=\"Scottish National Party\">SNP<\/acronym>, converted Labour into much more ardent devolution enthusiasts than they had been in 1979.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, as New Labour came closer to office, unlike the Tories, they realised that any <q>New Unionist<\/q> settlement would have to cover the whole of these islands and not just Northern Ireland. They developed the policy of <q>devolution-all-round<\/q> and a closer alliance with the Irish government.<\/p>\n<p>In Wales things were different. The main impetus behind the Welsh national movement had been cultural, particularly the Welsh language movement. Indeed, the division between English and Welsh speakers had formed part of the British state&#8217;s divide-and-rule strategy for Wales. However, in the 1980&#8217;s, when there was still militant action over the Welsh language and Plaid Cymru&#8217;s leader, Gwynfor Evans, threatened to go on a hunger strike over a Welsh-speaking <abbr title=\"Television\">TV<\/abbr> channel, the Tories developed a new strategy. This has become another thread of <q>New Unionism<\/q>.<\/p>\n<p>They decided to give state backing for approved Welsh language projects, with the aim of building up a British state-supporting, Welsh-speaking, middle-class, dependent on government subsidies for their cultural projects and incomes. A similar approach was later used in Northern Ireland, where Catholic Church and <acronym title=\"Social Democratic and Labour Party\">SDLP<\/acronym>-backed Irish language and cultural projects received state-funding, rather than those run by Republican ex-prisoners, who had learned and used Irish to better resist the prison authorities.<\/p>\n<p>Now, however, under the global corporations\u00b9 New World Order, culture is playing a much wider role. The politics of self-determination is being marginalised by the politics of consumer choice. People are free to choose any cultural identity they want. They just have to buy the right ethnic commodities, eat in the right ethnic restaurants, drink in the right themed pubs or go on the right cultural and historical courses. Under <q>New Unionism<\/q> there has been considerable funding for many cultural projects. In Ireland we have the Cultural Traditions group, whereby Orange marches just become one more quaint folk custom in the rich tapestry of Irish life!<\/p>\n<p>It is important to emphasise, that the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> and Irish governments are now pursuing a joint and agreed strategy. Yes, in the face of some <q>local difficulties<\/q> the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> regularly breaks the international treaty with Ireland, suspending the Northern Ireland Executive, without any prior notification to the Irish government. However, like the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> in regard to the <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym>, the Irish government knows its junior position in regard to the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym>. It knows its place in the world pecking order. Relations with the British government continue to be very good. There is even a Council of the Isles, with joint parliamentary representation from Westminster, the Dail, the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and Stormont.<\/p>\n<p>What does this mean for socialists? First, it means a clear understanding of the imperial nature of the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> state, both overseas, where it acts as a junior partner with the dominant <acronym title=\"United States\">US<\/acronym> imperialism, and at home, where it continues to deny genuine self-determination for the constituent nations of these islands. This means socialists must pursue a break-up of the <acronym title=\"United Kingdom\">UK<\/acronym> state strategy and also oppose the <q>crony capitalism<\/q> of its Irish government junior partner. However, just as the capitalist class has an overall strategy for these islands, this means that we too must have an overall strategy. We need a strategy of <q>internationalism from below<\/q>, which links socialist republicans in Scotland, Ireland, England and Wales. At the very least we need our own socialist republican Council of the Isles.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A talk given by Allan Armstrong (Republican Communist Network Platform in the Scottish Socialist Party) at the G8 Alternatives Summit on July 3rd 2005 in Edinburgh Earlier today, Eamon McCann, leading SWP member in Ireland, introduced a session entitled, Making Northern Ireland Safe for Neo-liberalism. It is revealing that such a prominent SWP member should&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1873],"tags":[230],"class_list":["post-16342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-against-unionism","tag-author-allan-armstrong"],"share_on_mastodon":{"url":"","error":""},"views":931,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=16342"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":20363,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16342\/revisions\/20363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=16342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=16342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/republicancommunist.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=16342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}