Oct 24 2014

STUC AND ITUC (NORTHERN COMMITTEE) DEMONSTRATIONS ON OCTOBER 18th.

On October 18th  the TUC, STUC and ITUC (Northern Committee) held demonstrations to protest against austerity.

Trade Unionists For Independence (East Coast) distributed the  leaflet below at the STUC rally, It’s Time to Create A Just Scotland, held in Glasgow on Saturday, October 18th. It was attended by 3500 trade unionists.

Socialist Democracy (Ireland) wrote the second piece about the demonstration in Belfast. 

1. AFTER SEPTEMBER 18th – BRING REAL DEMOCRACY INTO OUR TRADE UNIONS

 

IMG_2847 copy

 

The campaign for Scottish independence has been the largest movement for popular democracy seen in these islands since the Irish War of Independence. In terms of electoral participation it was unprecedented. Voter registration was 97% and voter turnout was 85%.

We faced the biggest ruling class offensive, backed by the UK state, since the Miners’ Strike. Only this time it brought together a combined Tory/Lib-Dem/Labour Better Together ‘No’ alliance, UKIP, the Orange Order, other Loyalists, British fascists, the BBC, the Pope and the Free Presbyterian Church, and the USA and China!

Continue reading “STUC AND ITUC (NORTHERN COMMITTEE) DEMONSTRATIONS ON OCTOBER 18th.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Aug 09 2014

THE TELLING OF TWO PRESS RELEASES. ONE A BALLS UP, THE OTHER FROM THE HAMSTER ON THE WHEEL

Jerry Hicks of there rank and file Grassroots UNITE campaign, who opposed Len McCluskey for General Secretary, writes of the significance of two press reloads, one from Ed Balls, Labour’s Shadow Chancellor, the other from McCluskey.

Len McCluskey adjusts his politics to Westminster time and the 2015 General Election

Len McCluskey adjusts his politics to Labour Westminster time and the 2015 General Election

Ed Balls adjusts Labour politics to meet the needs of the CBI

Ed Balls adjusts Labour politics to meet the needs of the CBI

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On a day of press releases, two stand out. One from Unite’s Len McCluskey, the other from Labour’s Ed Balls.

McCluskey promises Unite’s full support for Labour and Ed Miliband, including funding – and my word there will be a lot of that. While Ed Balls, Labour’s ‘would be’ next Chancellor of the Exchequer, promises what? Workers rights? Repeal of anti union laws? No, he promises tax breaks for businesses.

What an about turn considering McCluskey recently caught the headlines when he said “Unite may break with Labour, threatening to launch a ‘new party’, adding that Ed Miliband is drinking in the last chance saloon.”

When was this announced? At a press conference on April 1st or April Fools Day as it’s also known.

Continue reading “THE TELLING OF TWO PRESS RELEASES. ONE A BALLS UP, THE OTHER FROM THE HAMSTER ON THE WHEEL”

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Apr 09 2013

JERRY HICKS – UNITE GENERAL SECRETARY ELECTION UPDATE

JERRY HICKS – UNITE GENERAL SECRETARY ELECTION UPDATE

thGeorge Osborne said ‘Faster deeper’ cuts he meant it. Our side calls for strike action against those cuts – but do we mean it?

The announcement that Unite, is calling for a 24-hour general strike against austerity measures is very welcome. A serious program of strikes to defeat the Con Dem government is long overdue and a programme of coordinated strike action is the most effective way to stop them

The 1st April cuts to housing and other benefits will already be bringing more fear, hunger, debt and homelessness across the UK.

20% of the population is in poverty, but will bear 40% of all cuts. Disabled people, 8% of the population will bear 29% of all cuts. In the meantime, tax fraud remains 15 times higher than benefit fraud and the Tories callously blame the poor for their own plight. Demonising workers who they have thrown on the scrap heap.

The Con Dems can only get away with these barbaric measures because our side refuses to organise a real fight that would give people hope of an alternative. Unite must take some responsibility for this lack of effective resistance. The continuing lack of action feeds the Con Dems confidence to widen their attacks on ordinary working people.

Continue reading “JERRY HICKS – UNITE GENERAL SECRETARY ELECTION UPDATE”

Tags: , , , , , , ,


Mar 25 2013

RED BAITING AND SLURS

The SWP Central Committee has tried to draw a hard line between recent events inside the party and the wider Socialist and Trade Union movement. The SWP CC has made two arguments to defend the indefensible. The first is that  affairs inside the SWP are a purely internal matter,  and of no concern to other Socialists or trade unionists. Secondly, that those Socialists who do raise the issue in public are not living ‘in the real world’ where nobody cares about such ‘small matters’.

However, the issue has been raised in the election for  UNITE’s General Secretary – the largest union in these islands (UNITE also covers the whole of Ireland). The SWP CC can hardly claim anymore that the party’s internal affairs are not an issue ‘in the real world’, nor that it is a ‘small matter’. The SWP CC’s  behaviour has been raised in a particularly despicable manner by Broad Left incumbent, Len McCluskey. Below, we post the reply by Rank and File challenger, Jerry Hicks.

Furthermore, other trade unionists do have a real interest in questioning  the indefensible behaviour of the SWP CC. If anyone examines the signatories of the statement of SWP members in support of the CC, they will find that quite a few invoke their particular trade union membership, e.g. BECTU, BMA, EIS, FBU, GMB, NUJ, NUS, NUT, PCS, PROSPECT, UCU, UNISON, UNITE, USDAW. If the sort of allegations raised in the SWP were to be raised in any trade union against one of its officials, and swept under the carpet in a similar manner, there would quite rightly be outrage. Socialists should apply higher, not lower standards in their conduct, than those found elsewhere. 

Continue reading “RED BAITING AND SLURS”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


Aug 18 2012

PENSIONS DISPUTE

HAS THE TIDE TURNED?

It is a surprising feature of the socialist press that it longer catalogues the ebbs and flows of working class struggle.  Cheers of encouragement when the workers appear to advance are followed by glum silence on retreat. Yet for a brief period in Britain  it  appeared that there might be a sustained counterattack.  James Fearon looks back at the pensions revolt.

Despite the fact that a simmering frustration lies just beneath the surface of a workforce that is under sustained attack the trade union leadership have got away once again with demobilising any consistent public display of that discontent. What should have been another show of force in May on a similar scale to that of November 30th last year was a damp squib with only relatively small groups of workers on strike.  Bob Crow’s, let’s call it overoptimistic, suggestion that a general strike is just  around  the corner is highly implausible as no such plans exist and only 250 of the 79,500 RMT membership were on strike on May 10th. While the PCS did participate in a national strike the turn out for their national demonstration in London was appallingly low. Only 500 PCS strikers turned up to demonstrate at Methodist Central Hall while part of the state apparatus, nearly 30,000 off duty police, stole the limelight with a mobilization much more impressive than anything the trade union leadership could manage to organise. Anyone that hoped that the strike was going to be the opening shot in a protracted and determined struggle has serious cause to doubt Mark  Serwotka’s view that the tide has  turned.   Although he states that “the tide is coming back”, meaning that it is now running against austerity policies, and the ‘show is back on the road’ against pension reform, the evidence points in the opposite direction.

The May 10th strikes were deliberately low key in an attempt to have negotiations reopened with the government.  Mark Serwotka’s was attempting rapprochement with Dave Prentis, chair of the TUC’s public service liaison group responsible for renewing overtures to government, someone he previously described as being infected with ‘fatalism’, also points to an undue focus on negotiation. More strikes were planned for the end of June by the PCS who had promised to “build towards fresh walkouts at the end of next month with as many unions as possible, unless talks over the pension changes are reopened”. But should the talks reopen, what will they have to talk about? Further negotiations based on such a low level of struggle mean only one thing. Defeat!

With the interventions of Crow and Serwotka discounted, the overwhelming majority of the trade union bureaucracy have no intention of fighting, or even pretending to fight, leaving the efforts of both the PCS and RMT isolated. The TUC’s perspective extends only to patiently waiting for the election of Miliband who is around 10 points clear in the polls at the moment, but who has already debunked their ridiculous concept of a painless austerity by refusing to rule out cuts in advance of the election. Serwotka’s criticisms of Labour, mild as they are, and his attempted rapprochement with other civil service union leaders has immediately met with a rebuke from Chuka Ummuna of Labour, who urged the union leadership to keep Right, promote ‘competitiveness’ and not allow the “voice of protest” to drown out the image of themselves as “wealth creators”. This is music to the overwhelming majority of the bureaucracy’s ears. They cling desperately to the slightest possibility that a ‘plan B’ will be found and that Merkel will grant a fig leaf to Hollande, and by extension to themselves, by easing the austerity drive and allowing ‘fiscal easing’ to soften the blow, however marginally. This would play to their selfish illusions that they can weather the storm until a recovery occurs when they can then continue with business as usual, irrespective of course of the cost to the working class.

No consistent opposition to the already well-established assault on the working class is possible without the fullest mobilization of the trade unions’ huge membership. In order for this to be both possible and effective this can only be a mobilization in which rank and file union members find a way to take ownership of their organisations and to democratically control decision making. A huge gulf separates the overwhelming majority of members on low incomes from the handsomely remunerated bureaucrats that have no idea of what it is like to survive on a workers wage, and this must change. A good starting point is the campaign carried on by the Grass Roots Left [GRL] to have leaders elected who will accept an average industrial wage. Without a bottom up fight, and based upon that, a complete organizational overhaul, the present approach will lead to another sell out. Sending delegations from the existing bureaucracy, even its left wing, to negotiate in the face of a virulent and well organized capitalist assault on the basis of one or two days of declining industrial action will do nothing to thwart imperialism’s plans to save their banking industry at the expense of the world’s working class.

With the exception of the GRL, and the recent electricians struggle, no organized opposition has yet emerged within the demoralized body of the trade union movement and the bureaucracy gains strength from this. This demoralization is used as a tool to justify the bureaucracy’s position, they constantly parade it as a way of excusing their own inactivity; the petit-bureaucrats throw up their hands and complain that ‘a union is only as good as its members’. Their own culpability in the present lamentable situation is denied. The routinism of bureaucratic life; empty branch meetings with only the same functionaries and career orientated individuals turning up, meetings that are timed so that most members find it difficult to attend, moribund branches that still manage to nominate the most conservative candidate at election times, a turnout of 5-15% in those elections and no serious attempt to get people involved in union activities. This is the condition of our movement. If socialists are to make a conscious intervention in trade union affairs then it should be at this interface between the bureaucracy and their membership in order to help break, with utmost urgency, this cycle of decay and demoralization. This can only be done by building rank and file independence and not by befriending left leaning elements of the bureaucracy.

Workers will not be inspired by anything less.

 

Socialist Democracy (Ireland), July/August bulletin

 

http://www.socialistdemocracy.org/Bulletins/SDBulletinJuly2012HasTheTideTurned.html

Tags: , , , , , , ,