Jan 16 2021


Emancipation and Liberation is reposting this article by Rowan Fortune of Anti-Capitalist Resistance, which has appeared on the Republican Socialist Platform website.




“The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force”. Karl Marx

In his excoriating essay Notes on the English Character, novelist E. M. Forster located the reactionary core that defines our society’s worst habits. He identified the middle classes (that is, not wealthier workers, but the bourgeoisie, the industrialists) as the dominant historical force to shape us since the early modern period, moulding our values and aspirations. ‘Solidity, caution, integrity, efficiency. Lack of imagination, hypocrisy. These qualities characterize the middle classes in every country, but in England, they are national characteristics.’ The figure of John Bull personifies this, and public schools provide its material basis. The diagnosis remains true today.

Forster outlined an instance of what Italian Marxist, Antonio Gramsci, called cultural hegemony, whereby a ruling class imposes its worldview as cultural norms. The specifics of how it happens are uncovered in Alex Renton’s exposé of the selfsame ‘learning’ institutions, Stiff Upper Lip. Here, Renton documents the child abuse, neglect, sports cults, anti-intellectualism and misogyny that comprises the making of our upper class, and through their domination over media and politics, emanates out across society.

Renton has much praise for Forster’s essay, and much to say against celebrations of these institutions of abuse and power found in the literature of, for instance, Enid Blyton and J. K. Rowling (more on the latter later). Few British people actually go to a public school, but the attitudes and prejudices formed there filter down. Amongst these attitudes is an upholding of the patriarchy; most of these schools were recently gender-segregated, some still are, and all have fixed traditions that lock in place a narrow range of gender roles, any breaking of which threatens the edifice of English upper-class culture.

For Forster, the vice of the English character is not a lack of feeling, but a fear of it, and not mere hypocrisy, but hypocrisy arising from the muddle-headedness our public schools impart. It is my claim here that muddle-headedness explains the exaggerated susceptibility of our isle to a moral panic about transgender people, one all about upholding gender roles, and which finds its origins in the English elite, but that then drips-drips-drips to infect us all with its poison.

For Forster, Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility illustrates this English quality; the example he uses comes from the novel’s beginning, where a man is convinced to leave less and less of an inheritance to impoverished relations, despite promising to the departed to be generous, not from spite or greed but a type of self-deception. This ability to self-deceive is on display in the so-called transgender debates, where a group of the oppressed has become the target of baseless attacks from across the political spectrum.

Transphobia (in-hoc with other ‘acceptable’ prejudices such as islamophobia, ableism, anti-Roma, and anti-Black bigotry) is the vanguard of British fascism. It is a wedge used by the most cynical far-right extremists and theocrats in aid of further attacks on other groups of the oppressed who have for centuries fought and won a greater acknowledgment of their humanity (from women to gay people) and it thrives in a context of entrenched, inexcusable muddled-headedness. In the course of this essay, the transmission of such ideas and the motives behind them will be sketched, but there is a need for more work to fully uncover the susceptibility of the UK to this prejudice.

The case of Keira Bell and puberty blockers is exemplary of the muddle. Bell was one of the claimants to take Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust to court during 2020 over providing treatments for trans teenagers. Her aim, rooted in her experiences of detransitioning, was to raise the bar of consent so high as to effectively prevent most from accessing these vital interventions. Her case is deeply tragic (more on which later), but the deceptions involved in extrapolating from it to justify her other goals stretches credibility. The main argument here is a version of the slippery slope fallacy (so beloved by reactionaries), namely that blockers seamlessly progress to other treatments in early adulthood, so that a teenager is effectively consenting also to those more permanent measures.

Puberty blockers are targeted by the anti-trans movement because nothing cements a moral panic like the plea, in the words of Simpson’s character Helen Lovejoy, ‘Won’t somebody please think of the children?’ In truth, blockers are demonstrably not a risky experiment threatening children’s well-being, but an under-resourced intervention that permits trans teenagers an opportunity to mitigate gender dysphoria. It affords them the chance to decide on more serious treatments as adults. There is plenty of extant evidence that blockers are a vital service and, far from too readily provided, are overly restricted. Therefore, as with many social goods, they are often least available to the poorest. Numerous organisations have already taken apart the specious basis for this attack on trans rights. Their voices, however, are too rarely joined by socialists who ought to be, in Lenin’s words, tribunes of the oppressed.

Gender Identity Research & Education Society have spoken of the devastation this ruling will likely cause to young trans people. Stonewall, in their response, noted that blockers have been vital for decades to both children experiencing precocious puberty as well as those questioning their identity. The International Journal of Transgender Health has shown at length that the ruling contravenes not only morality, but science. And Dr. Adrian Harrop was so moved by his patients’ desperation, he produced a forty-minute video explaining in layman’s terms the realities of hormone blockers.

There are a broader range of arguments deployed to justify transphobia, beyond our scope here but never more credible than the issue of puberty blockers. For instance, there are anecdotal claims about trans women posing a threat to cis women (cis is the identity of someone aligned with the gender assigned to them at birth); proposed pseudoscientific conditions such as ‘rapid-onset gender dysphoria’ or ‘autogynephilia’, which belong alongside historic classifications of homosexuality as a mental illness. The Sociological Review Monographs publication TERF Wars: Feminism and the fight for transgender futures is a good place to look for responses to these kinds of arguments. Some Marxists, in a display of vulgar materialism, argue that trans ‘ideology’ is bourgeois idealism since biology is material and identity is ideas; Red Fightback’s free pamphlet, Marxism and Transgender Liberation: Confronting Transphobia in the British Left, makes short work of the biological, anthropological and historical underpinnings of such errors.

When all the arguments fail, however, muddle can be relied on to come to the rescue. People who lend such ideas credence will find a boost to their muddle, finally, by searching out the tiny number of transgender people who even partially endorse some subset of the above arguments, either as a part of an elaborate grift or due to their own muddles. This tactic, the basest option available to an oppressor, shows a truly desperate desire to hold on to prejudice.

Unfortunately for those who adhere to such a strategy, it ignores that transgender anti-trans voices confer as much validity to attacks against trans people as Candace Owens does to the ‘controversies’ of Black rights in the US. Or, for that matter, as Owens does to transphobia, as such far-right personalities always seem to show the true nature of anti-trans belief by situating it alongside all the other fascist bugbears.

Healthcare for trans people is woefully inadequate in the UK, involving unacceptable waiting lists and a postcode lottery of whether or not a person’s GP will refuse to provide treatment—something that, for those already undergoing medication they are unable to quickly and safely stop, can make moving house endangering. If there are trans issues, medical neglect would seem to be the most obvious example.

Indeed, there is reason to believe that trans people suffer disproportionately high rates of abuse, under- and unemployment, work-based discrimination, and therefore unsurprisingly, mental health problems. Even the alarmingly transphobic BBC has reported police statistics that in 2018 hate crimes against trans people went up 81%. This almost certainly reflects increasing hostility leveraged by the far-right culture war, one championed by a racist, homophobic, and transphobic Tory government.
Statistics do poor justice to the realities they usefully condense. So when you read the Youth Chances 2014 survey’s findings, keep in mind the young trans women, trans men, and nonbinary people whose deaths and pain is reduced to data. They found that 83 per cent of trans young people have experienced verbal abuse, 60 per cent threats and intimidation; 35 per cent physical assault; 27 per cent have attempted suicide; 89 per cent suffer from suicidal ideation and 72 per cent have self-harmed at least once. These are lives, eroded by a culture of intimidation, abetted by indifference.

It is hard to know how many trans people live in the UK today. Numbers are undoubtedly distorted by the need many feel to be closeted, fearful they too will be targets of a hatred endorsed by all quarters. Trans people have every reason to be fearful of exposure even in the best of times, but in a period of creeping fascism, when a target of fascist agitation, they have even more reason for caution. Transphobia (like transgender people themselves) is not a new development. Trans people represent some of fascism’s first victims. As Marxism and Transgender Liberation explains:

In interwar Germany, there was a thriving ‘transsexual’ community, and the Institut für Sexualwissenschaft (Institute for Sexual Science) was formed to research and advocate for sexual minorities. It pioneered gender confirmation surgery and hormone replacement therapy, and also housed a large archive of LGBTI+ history. Upon taking power in 1933, one of the first things the Nazis did was ransack and destroy the Institut, burning the entirety of its archive. The Nazis created new policies that led to the incarceration, castration, and eventual extermination of LGBTI people. In 1979, the ‘original TERF’ Janice Raymond referred to trans men as the ‘final solution of women’; rhetoric that continues to be repeated by TERFs, and which cynically erases and trivialises the Nazis’ targeting of trans people and the destruction of pro-LGBTI+ knowledge as part of the Holocaust. Extreme anti-LGBT attitudes never disappeared, and trans people are the canary in the coal mine. In October 2019, a Telegraph column argued ‘it’s time trans people carried ID cards’.

With such a legacy, transphobes today go to the likes of Keira Bell to justify the unjustifiable. Detrans cases are rare (less than 1%), they are not always regretful, and most report that the primary reason is transphobia and unsatisfactory surgeries, with at least some retransitioning. To repeat, Bell’s story should make anyone empathise. That she suffered grievously from an adult choice she came to regret is tragic, and it is wrong if she was not given the support she needed. Detrans people should be supported (a necessity if anyone is to be allowed to safely question their gender). Paramount, however, the existence of detrans people does not justify bigotry against trans people.

The irony is that Bell wishes to force her tragedy on young trans people, that of growing into a body that contradicts their identities. However much sympathy Bell’s case warrants, her role in a far-right project merits condemnation. Her lawyer, Paul Conrathe, is known for targeting women’s reproductive rights under the same absurd justifications of ‘consent’ he used to restrict access to puberty blockers. And if Bell’s motives are doubted, after winning the case she pushed for conversion therapy for trans people, a practice rightly abhorred when applied to LGB people. ‘I would like to personally call on professionals and clinicians to create better mental health services and models to help those dealing with gender dysphoria to reconcile with their sex.’

Ties between anti-trans organisations and fascist groups are so transparent it is alarming how little notice such links receive. Such is the nature of the collective muddle within which transphobia festers, the far-right hardly feels a need to hide its plans to defeat the LGBTQIA+ community by splitting off the T. The homophobic, misogynistic, racist and transphobic organisation the Family Research Council (closely linked to the Trump regime) has explicitly talked of a divide and rule strategy targeting gender identity.

Two far-right organisations with ties to ‘progressive’ anti-trans groups (an oxymoron) are the publication Spiked (famous for its pseudo-Marxist roots and shift to reactionary politics) and the theocratic Heritage Foundation. Anti-trans journalists Julie Burchill and Jo Bartosch have written for the former, while prominent TERFs (trans exclusionary radical feminists) Kellie-Jay ‘Posie Parker’ Keen-Minshull and Julia Long have given speeches for the latter. Parker was also invited to speak to Women’s Place UK,* and even involved in a counter-demo against BLM. The hate group LGB Alliance has been shown to engage in numerous other prejudices than transphobia and counts neo-Nazis amongst followers. Moreover, it has been revealed that LGBA’s following is significantly less concerned with LGB rights than exclusively targeting trans people.

As Paulo Freire wrote during the 70s in Pedagogy of the Oppressed, ‘oppressors try to present themselves as saviours of the women and men they dehumanise and divide. This messianism, however, cannot conceal their true intention, to save themselves.’ No matter how few trans people there are in this country, the transphobic fascist wedge should be a serious concern for any socialist. It should remain a truism on the left that a threat to one is a threat to all.

For that reason, the mainstreaming of transphobia ought to be troubling. There are too many recent examples of this to cover, there will be more when this essay comes out. A prominent recent instance is Amol Rajan granting the Russell Prize to a transphobic essay penned by J. K. Rowling, on the behalf of the BBC. (The very BBC which has already been reprimanded by Ofcom for a declared policy of ‘balancing’ trans people’s media appearances with anti-trans activists.) Bertrand Russell (a friend of the gay E. M. Forster) supported the Homosexual Law Reform Society. He opposed dogma and bigotry. To invoke him for a transphobe and her mediocre essay, which includes such stylistic travesties as ‘woke cookies’, is repulsive.

Finally, in her capacity as Minister for Women and Equalities, Liz Truss recently made a series of perplexing comments to launch a new government approach to her brief. She declared war on the philosophy of Michel Foucault, on identity politics, on woke orthodoxy (that word again), on protected characteristics and lived experience. (The platitudes and vagaries this government opposes are, of course, matched by vagaries and platitudes it supports: right thinking, individualism, fairness.)

This is an attempt to attack fractures on the left (where postmodernism and Marxism, identity and universality, class and oppression are hotly, if not always intelligently, debated). And that this is a part of the Tory’s squalid culture war has, indeed, been noticed. (More plausible than a Tory minister with serious opinions on continental philosophy!) It is perhaps predictable, then, that one fracture being targeted is transphobia. Truss’s accompanying speech, which has all the weight of the British state, was extraordinarily transphobic. She compares ‘failing to defend single sex-spaces’ (a dog whistle) with antisemitism and paedophile grooming.
That the British media is transphobic is scarcely arguable. That transphobia is rife online is well established too. That the British website Mumsnet has become for internet transphobia what 4Chan was for Donald Trump’s alt-right is made clear by multiple investigations. And that the world looks on us as a swamp of such bigotry should be a cause for shame. But we are not fated to this muddle.

We are all susceptible to the muddle instilled by cultural hegemonies. Just as in Austen’s Sense and Sensibility, prejudices and vices do not always appear as such. When I met the woman I love, I was taken to a crass class reductionism. I considered myself a consistent anti-racist, but failed to perceive how class and oppression needed carefully delineating. Listening to her experiences as a Black woman helped me through this error, but it also required soul-searching. Similarly, when I first heard of nonbinary genders, I was initially dismissive. Now, I wonder if my relationship to gender does not fall under that umbrella. People can overcome prejudice, but when the principle of solidarity is abandoned in favour of short-cuts to mainstream respectability, it becomes all but necessary to throw those who once were our natural allies under the bus of fascist rhetoric.

We are not fated to join those countries (such as Poland and Hungry) that make the persecution of trans people a priority (any more than they are fated to remain in such a state). As the rise of fascist groups in the 70s was fought, as LGBTQIA+ people turned the tide on homophobia after the 80s, we can change the world for the better. In coming to the defence of trans humanity, we save ourselves. We save ourselves from a muddle-headedness that is not destiny, but a historical wound inflicted on our humanity by the particular fault lines of a class society. The struggles of workers and the oppressed continue to show us the way, we can heed them.


This article was posted at:-

Notes on British transphobia


For an article addressing the situation of transgendered people in Scotland, see the links in

  1.  Scott Macdonald – Queer Liberation means Trans Equality




2.  Edinburgh RIC – Transgender Rights 




Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 14 2021



Emancipation & Liberation is posting this article by James Dennis Hoff of  Left Voices USA about the horrific number of migrant deaths in the EU and USA in 2020. 





On December 24, the bodies of more than 20 Tunisian refugees, including at least four pregnant women, were recovered after their boat sank in the Mediterranean Sea. The vessel, which was bound for the Italian island of Lampedusa, was reported to be carrying as many as 45 passengers, but only five people are known to have survived the wreck.

Like the more than 10,000 Tunisians who have attempted to reach Italy this year, these refugees were fleeing crushing poverty, economic deprivation, and a brutal IMF-imposed austerity plan that has caused irregular mass immigration since 2011 to several European countries including France, Italy, and Germany. Tens of thousands of Libyans and sub-Saharan African immigrants, fleeing poverty and violence, have also used Tunisian ports or attempted to reach Europe by crossing the Mediterranean, and hundreds have died in the attempt. Continue reading “2020 WAS ONE OF THE DEADLIEST YEARS FOR MIGRANTS – AND NOT JUST BECAUSE OF COVID”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 14 2021


We are posting the following two articles on the Brexit. The first by  Steve Freeman, posted on the Republican Socialist Network blog, highlights the  nature of the constitutional crisis article brought about by Brexit. The second from Socialist Democracy (Ireland) is  about the likely political impact of Brexit on Ireland and the illusion that this will pave the wa  to Irish reunification under the auspices of the Irish Dail and the Northern Irish Stormont.





The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland left the European Union in February 2020 with a stay of execution until 31 December 2020. On the 30 December the country faced a dire emergency. Next day the Great Britain would crash out of the Single Market and Customs Union, leaving Northern Ireland in the single market for goods with a EU customs border with the rest of the UK. The only question in doubt is whether there would be the safety net of a trade deal to prevent a crash. Continue reading “BREXIT – A NEW CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 10 2021


We are posting the following article by Nathaniel Flakin of Left Voices in the USA. This is response to all the nauseating hypocrisy coming from the Democrats and other neo-liberals about the USA’s great democratic traditions. 



Top Bolivian coup plotters trained in the School of the Americas* in Columbus Georgia


The United States has long supported right-wing protests to subvert elections. This is so common that there’s a joke about it: Why has there never been a military coup in the U.S.? Because there is no U.S. embassy there.

“This is not what America stands for.” That’s what Thom Thillis, a Republican senator from North Carolina, wrote on Twitter while a right-wing mob was marauding through the Capitol. This sentiment was echoed throughout the liberal media and by members of both the Republican and Democratic Parties, who repeated the refrain that “America is better than this.” The right-wing riot was clearly not a “fascist coup attempt” by any stretch. But the images coming out of the Capitol looked eerily similar to actions that the U.S. regime regularly supports in other countries, especially in Latin America. Continue reading ““THIS IS NOT WHAT AMERICA STANDS FOR” – EXCEPT, UH, IN LATIN AMERICA”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Jan 07 2021


The ruling class has fully fallen in behind Johnson’s Brexit deal. After the Leave vote, May, assisted by Corbyn,  had already delivered them a new gastarbeiter scheme with cheap easily disposable migrant labour. Now after the December 29th vote to accept Johnson’s hard Brexit deal,  Daniel Hannan,* former Tory MEP and president of the Initiative for Free Trade, has flagged up the scrapping of EU worker and consumer protection rules. Sir Keir Starmer, quick to see the lack of any ruling class support for EU, has fallen in line, not even being prepared to vote against Johnson’s deal on December 29th.  This article by Phil Vellender looks to the shrinking prospects for those on the Left in England who wanted to Remain in the EU. It highlights their political limitations, particularly those of Another Europe Is Possible, flowing from their acceptance of the UK state based on the profoundly anti-democratic sovereignty of the Union and the Crown in Westminster, 





Some Remain voters are setting up ‘Rejoin EU ASAP’ groups. This is an entirely understandable reaction to a traumatic hard Brexit that no one voted for, and certainly many would not vote for again, given all the evidence we now have of the shenanigans and empty promises involved in the Cummings-Elliot Leave EU campaign. But before we expend a lot of energy on a project with, let’s face it, scant chance of success as things stand now, it might be timely to address some domestic constitutional matters those ‘yearning to return’ may have overlooked when they unreservedly and single-mindedly backed the People’s Vote campaign, and its demand for a ‘Second Referendum’. Continue reading “WHITHER REMAIN OR WILL REMAIN WITHER?”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 27 2020


This article, originally posted by Socialist Democracy (Ireland), highlights the ineffectiveness  of the ICTU Northern Committee and trade union bureaucracy working within the parameters of the existing unionist state when it when it comes to protecting workers’ jobs, pay and condition.




UNITE offices in Belfast


If the Irish Congress of Trade Unions through its partnership with the state is the creature of imperialism in the South, the same is glaringly apparent in the North.  Historically, no imperialist atrocity was ever great enough for them to go beyond carefully ‘balanced’ statements, or to take any consistent action in defence of oppressed working-class communities.  They stuck strictly to ‘workplace issues’ and their perception of ‘workers interests’ were unfailingly expressed as cries for a peace coupled to imperialist stabilisation and investment.  Now that the impact of imperialist decline in the industrial heartland of the north east reveals that imperialism owes workers nothing their response is one of paralysis.. Continue reading “THE TRADE UNION BUREAUCRACY AND UNIONISM IN NORTHERN IRELAND”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 21 2020


In the following two articles, Daniel Lazare looks at the legacy of  ‘Repocratic’ politics. in the USA. In the first he emphasises the role of the US constitution in creating the stalemate in US politics. In the second he shows how Trump has boxed Biden in over US Middle East policy. This follows the Democrats’ success in boxing Trump in over his attempt to form an agreement with Putin’s Russia, the better to contain a rising Chinese imperialism and to break the EU’s protectionist hold  over much of Europe.




American politics can be confusing, and here are just a few examples why:

 January 2017: Democratic Congressman John Lewis calls Donald Trump illegitimate a week prior to inauguration day, on the grounds that “the Russians participated in helping this man get elected, and they helped destroy the candidacy of Hillary Clinton”. The New York Times happily agrees, as do Joe Biden and Hillary Clinton. But then just last week, a Times editorial assails Republicans for questioning Biden’s legitimacy, because by doing so they “are undermining the rule of law”.1 . Continue reading “US CRISIS AND REPOCRATIC POLITICS”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Dec 16 2020


E&L is posting this article by Gearoid O’ Loingsigh on the political situation in Colombia and the hypocrisy of its government in its handling  of drugs trafficking (often quite literally!) Furthermore,  the article also shows how the City and the UK’s Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies helps with the laundering of drug money. 





The issue of drugs is one that is never far from public discourse on the Colombian conflict.  Biased or just simply lazy journalists use the issue to ascribe motives for an endless list of events, massacre and murders.  It is true that drug trafficking has permeated all of Colombian society and there is no sector that has not been impacted by it.  But not everyone in Colombia is a drug trafficker.  However, once again the King of Clubs is played to describe the conflict in terms of a drug problem.

Several Colombian newspapers have recently published articles on the supposed relationship of the guerrillas of the National Liberation Army (ELN) with drug trafficking and there are already eleven commanders who are under investigation for such crimes and are sought in extradition.(1)  They talk as if the ELN dominated the drugs trade, and talk of settling of accounts over drug money, as if they were a crime gang, instead of saying that the ELN takes drastic measures against its members who get involved in drug trafficking and that those internal executions are due to the indiscipline and betrayal of principles of some people and are not an internal dispute over money.(2)  Of course, the ELN in an open letter widely distributed on social networks and alternative press, denied any links to the drug trade.(3)  But, how true is this new tale?  Before looking at the accusations levelled against the ELN it is worth going over the history of drug trafficking in Colombia and the reality of the business in international terms. Continue reading “COLOMBIA: DRUGS, WAR AND THE ELN”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov 18 2020


E&L is posting the following two articles on the situation in the USA after Biden’s presidential electoral victory. Far from heralding a new “progressive” era, or even a return to “normality”, Biden is already preparing the grounds for  a neo-Trumpist populist backlash. The first article by . M. K. Kumar  in the USA looks at the nature of Biden’s transition team. The second article by Paul Demarty examines the pyrrhic nature of Biden’s “victory”.



Cindy McCain, Republican and Chair of Hensley & Co

Joe Biden’s transition team is full of every kind of capitalist — CEOs, tech execs, even Republican lawmakers. Where are the Squad members or other progressives who were supposed to be moving his administration “to the left”?

Since Joe Biden won the 2020 Presidential election, there has been much speculation around the kind of president he will be. While some believe, he might be persuaded by the progressive wings of his party who are rallying for the Green New Deal and Medicare for All, there is no doubt that he will choose to remain a centrist Democrat, who prioritizes profit over people at every turn and sees capitalists as his only constituents in an America where “nothing will fundamentally change.” To understand his future Presidency, one need not look further than his transition team, composed of over 400 Obama-era staffers, academics, Congressional representatives — and more than a few tech moguls. The Biden-Harris campaign has touted this list as especially inclusive and diverse: more than half of the personnel will be women, and at least 40 percent are people of color or people who identify as LGBTQ+. A more diverse transition team however does not ensure the end of oppression and identity politics is no path to liberation. Continue reading “BIDEN: A TRANSITION TO NEO-TRUMPIST POPULISM?”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Nov 08 2020


Following the posting of our Irish coverage(http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2020/10/15/emancipation-liberation-irish-coverage-2002-20/), E&L is posting our  Welsh and republican related coverage from 2002 to 2020 to promote a wider socialist republican ‘internationalism from below’ alliance






The British Left and the UK State – Allan Armstrong, RCN, Republican Socialist Platform


From grey to red granite – Allan Armstrong, RCN, Republican Socialist Platform   Continue reading “EMANCIPATION & LIBERATION – WELSH COVERAGE 2002-20”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Next Page »