<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which Way Now for the SSP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2006/03/16/which-way-now-for-the-ssp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2006/03/16/which-way-now-for-the-ssp/</link>
	<description>Republican Communist Network, a platform in the Scottish Socialist Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 20:25:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emancipation &#38; Liberation &#187; Emancipation &#38; Liberation Index 12</title>
		<link>http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2006/03/16/which-way-now-for-the-ssp/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Emancipation &#38; Liberation &#187; Emancipation &#38; Liberation Index 12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 17:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicancommunist.org/blog/?p=125#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] Which way now for the SSP, Allan Armstrong [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Which way now for the SSP, Allan Armstrong [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RCN</title>
		<link>http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2006/03/16/which-way-now-for-the-ssp/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>RCN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 16:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicancommunist.org/blog/?p=125#comment-18</guid>
		<description>r.e. out of date: This article was originally published in Spring 2006. We had fallen behind publishing them on the website and so are catching up on the blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>r.e. out of date: This article was originally published in Spring 2006. We had fallen behind publishing them on the website and so are catching up on the blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lenin</title>
		<link>http://republicancommunist.org/blog/2006/03/16/which-way-now-for-the-ssp/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>lenin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 07:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicancommunist.org/blog/?p=125#comment-13</guid>
		<description>This article is not only hopelessly out-dated, it is utterly ignorant of basic facts.  There is no such body as the &#039;Anti-Fascist Alliance&#039;.  The ANL still exists and has been integrated into Unite Against Fascism.  The Campaign Against Climate Change is not run by the SWP, nor to my knowledge does it have extensive SWP involvement.  And much less is it &quot;answerable only to the SWP’s Central Committee&quot;.  You can see a full list of its officials here: http://www.campaigncc.org/about.shtml  Finally, if this article was not comical enough already, it belabours the SWP for not challenging the rightward drift of Labourist elements in Respect on the basis of &#039;Beautiful Soul&#039; politics, as if there had not been a massive split over precisely this issue - an artefact of it being ridiculously out-of-date, not to mention out of touch with reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is not only hopelessly out-dated, it is utterly ignorant of basic facts.  There is no such body as the &#8216;Anti-Fascist Alliance&#8217;.  The ANL still exists and has been integrated into Unite Against Fascism.  The Campaign Against Climate Change is not run by the SWP, nor to my knowledge does it have extensive SWP involvement.  And much less is it &#8220;answerable only to the SWP’s Central Committee&#8221;.  You can see a full list of its officials here: <a href="http://www.campaigncc.org/about.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaigncc.org/about.shtml</a>  Finally, if this article was not comical enough already, it belabours the SWP for not challenging the rightward drift of Labourist elements in Respect on the basis of &#8216;Beautiful Soul&#8217; politics, as if there had not been a massive split over precisely this issue &#8211; an artefact of it being ridiculously out-of-date, not to mention out of touch with reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
